Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DrMycoForestry's avatar

I'm deeply skeptical of efforts to account for the "real cost" of regenerative farming by increasing the price of regeneratively farmed goods. I think they are misguided, which feels like a weird thing to say. It's a new perspective to me, and I'm still adjusting to it. But here's my most direct argument for this case: If we reward farms that engage in regenerative farming with higher price premiums for their products, then these products become more expensive (obviously). This means they will always be luxury goods. The person that can't afford rent is never going to choose them. If we want a society of regenerative farms, we need the food of the poorest person to be regeneratively grown. How can we achieve this? I think there needs to be an "exploitation" tax put on foods farmed intensively and at scale. There needs to be punishment in the market for exploitation to reclaim the margin gained by that exploitation. I'm honestly not sure if monetary policy can solve this problem because I see the monetization of our relationships as a key mechanism for maintaining exploitation.

Expand full comment
John Gonter's avatar

"We’re all fighting battles nobody sees. Farming carries generations of trauma that don’t fit neatly into a social media post." - Helen Freeman.

Everyone should read the Unsettling of America by Wendell Berry. Many of you already have.

And read this at least twice: 'I think part of what we are all feeling (and I have a lot of trouble fully articulating) is how entangled food is with commerce/"the economy" now.' - Liz Reitzig.

We can't have it both ways. If you want to everything to be convenient and shop at Walmart for everything you need, farming becomes inextricably linked to to big business. Only when people re-invest in commerce that supports local and regional producers and encourages them to operate lower energy systems will we be able to decouple farming from long-haul diesel, Walmart purchasing methods and degraded soil. Obviously this is an absurd over-simplification--but we just can't have our cake and eat it to.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts